|
|
Post by abbey on Jan 31, 2005 5:04:47 GMT
Wife and kid(s) left behind or just brought over and renamed and remarried under the guise of Paul McCartney? Could there have been a Linda as part of the wife's name or in her family somewhere?  Or could Linda just be a handy "new name"? Why couldn't Heather have been his kid from the start? Has anyone ever seen or heard from the guy with the last name See who was SUPPOSED to be her first hubby and Heather's father? Why has the guy just dropped out of sight and never even tried to see his so called daughter? ? Questions, questions, always more questions and not even solid answers. |
|
|
|
Post by byrdsmaniac on Mar 10, 2005 0:54:11 GMT
The Melody Maker Awards. Filmed September 9th (?) 1966. One of the last known photographs of James Paul McCartney.  excerpts from "ONE AFTER 909" I begged her not to go and I begged her on my bended knees You're only FOOLing around, You're FOOLing around with me I said "Move over" ONCE "Move over" TWICE Come on baby, don't be COLD AS ICE... I said "We're traveling with the one AFTER 909" (There were two replacements) |
|
|
|
Post by abbey on Mar 10, 2005 16:08:39 GMT
Byrdsmaniac - One after 909 is one of their earliest songs. It was recorded later, though. I don't see how it could have anything to do with a replacement. It was written & they sang it in the early sixties  |
|
|
|
Post by byrdsmaniac on Mar 10, 2005 17:20:22 GMT
AMAZING isn't it? I'll say more later.
|
|
|
|
Post by gracemer on Mar 10, 2005 18:30:49 GMT
Byrdsmaniac - One after 909 is one of their earliest songs. It was recorded later, though. I don't see how it could have anything to do with a replacement. It was written & they sang it in the early sixties And Faul played the bass like crap in the later recording! You'll find a comparison very interesting. |
|
|
|
Post by unrepentant on Mar 11, 2005 0:12:18 GMT
maybe exhuming ONE AFTER 909 was done with a nod towards exposing the coverup? it's not the beatles finest hour in the studio, but the bass lines were smartly conceived and competently played by PAUL, not that weird guy bill who replaced him.
if you listen to bootlegs [especially the overdub sessions] the real paul had a certain rapport with his bandmates that is sorely lacking in the LET IT BE stuff.
|
|
|
|
Post by abbey on Mar 11, 2005 14:36:54 GMT
Is that ever true. They all sorely missed him  |
|
|
|
Post by abbey on May 6, 2005 15:00:43 GMT
I just found this photo of Bill, circa 1968-69:  There's a scar on his right cheek !!! |
|
|
|
Post by Michelle, ma belle on Dec 5, 2008 4:46:14 GMT
I just found this photo of Bill, circa 1968-69: There's a scar on his right cheek !!! What are chances this is James Paul made up to look like Faul? I'm using distance from bridge of his nose to end of chin as measuring unit. Shoulders are too small for this man to be Faul, ear to ear distance too big for Faul's narrow face. Problem with the cheek could be Bell palsy treatment. www.youtube.com/watch?v=xuv0kiuDJM8 |
|
|
|
Post by Sun King™ on Sept 25, 2009 23:52:01 GMT
 The photo on the right is taken from gettyimages® archive  |
|
|
|
Post by brtanner on Mar 6, 2010 23:13:57 GMT
The photo on the right is taken from gettyimages® archive The way the scars match is spooky. Posting to keep my membership on the forum. It's truly sad how few people get the significance of Paul's replacement or understand the magnitude of the project to keep it out of sight. Message boards I've been on covering it are obviously cruised by multiple trolls very clever in keeping people confused and blind. This is just one part of the massive work to control our minds... |
|
fingo
Welcome new member
ollopAyenohpamai
Posts: 6
|
Post by fingo on Mar 7, 2010 4:34:28 GMT
I just found this photo of Bill, circa 1968-69: There's a scar on his right cheek !!! Very strange.......... |
|
|
|
Post by Connor "The Red Neck" Terru on Mar 7, 2010 4:44:47 GMT
I just found this photo of Bill, circa 1968-69: There's a scar on his right cheek !!! Very strange.......... The "scar" could be from the age of the photo. We don't know how it was processed, or how it was scanned, or the condition it was in, so even PIAers like myself can't make a valid conclusin, other than that "Bill" looks a lot like Paul in this picture. |
|
|
|
Post by Forum Manager on Mar 8, 2010 2:11:15 GMT
Posting to keep my membership on the forum. It's truly sad how few people get the significance of Paul's replacement or understand the magnitude of the project to keep it out of sight. Message boards I've been on covering it are obviously cruised by multiple trolls very clever in keeping people confused and blind. This is just one part of the massive work to control our minds... Welcome brtanner. Yes I have found that most people do not understand why Paul's replacement is significant. I have heard so many responses along the lines of..."who cares?" "not important" "not interesting" etc. I have come to view apathy as a defense mechanism for people who are not prepared to accept an idea that may rearrange their worldview. I have done my best to keep this board free of trolls....however it may have made this board less active than others. If anything the trolls help in a way by bringing more attention to the issue. |
|
Lic.Teish
Contributor
There's nothing you can't see that isn't shown
Posts: 161
|
Post by Lic.Teish on Mar 29, 2010 2:45:14 GMT
![]() [/img] how many paul´s replacements fotographied at all as it would be the same Pauls Replacement. Phil & Denny. For John Syd & Ralph. For Ringo Tara and for George Erik and Syd. One and One and One is Three. Got to be GOOD LOOKING cause its so hard 2c... Looking through a glass onion(John Glasses from out to inn.(one after one on one=3) Its all in the drama.(dream number 9=3x3)eight days a week(8=4x2) 8+the one is 9 . The one is the fiftbeatles after four ones. Neil.After the 8 you got the fiftian replaced,the nine.Neil ASpINail (a spyderman with 8 arms to hold you)Neil ´s coloumn. cerebral vc ortex visible conversion I just found this photo of Bill, circa 1968-69: There's a scar on his right cheek !!! file:///F:/beatles/Faul%20solo%202/faul_1.jpg Attachments:
|
|
Lic.Teish
Contributor
There's nothing you can't see that isn't shown
Posts: 161
|
Post by Lic.Teish on Mar 29, 2010 2:47:34 GMT
![]() [/img] ![]() [/img] how many paul´s replacements fotographied at all as it would be the same Pauls Replacement. Phil & Denny. For John Syd & Ralph. For Ringo Tara and for George Erik and Syd. One and One and One is Three. Got to be GOOD LOOKING cause its so hard 2c... Looking through a glass onion(John Glasses from out to inn.(one after one on one=3) Its all in the drama.(dream number 9=3x3)eight days a week(8=4x2) 8+the one is 9 . The one is the fiftbeatles after four ones. Neil.After the 8 you got the fiftian replaced,the nine.Neil ASpINail (a spyderman with 8 arms to hold you)Neil ´s coloumn. cerebral vc ortex visible conversion I just found this photo of Bill, circa 1968-69: There's a scar on his right cheek !!! file:///F:/beatles/Faul%20solo%202/faul_1.jpg Attachments:
|
|
|
|
Post by dmystified on May 19, 2011 4:43:49 GMT
Posting to keep my membership on the forum. It's truly sad how few people get the significance of Paul's replacement or understand the magnitude of the project to keep it out of sight. Message boards I've been on covering it are obviously cruised by multiple trolls very clever in keeping people confused and blind. This is just one part of the massive work to control our minds... Welcome brtanner. Yes I have found that most people do not understand why Paul's replacement is significant. I have heard so many responses along the lines of..."who cares?" "not important" "not interesting" etc. I have come to view apathy as a defense mechanism for people who are not prepared to accept an idea that may rearrange their worldview. I have done my best to keep this board free of trolls....however it may have made this board less active than others. If anything the trolls help in a way by bringing more attention to the issue. I know someone with the right worldview for this, but he still says it's not interesting or important. He says things like whether something else happens soon in the middle east, or things like that, matter more. I said these things are the reason those things continue to happen, and they're all a part of the whole. I think they all matter, and this certainly has my full attention because I grew up in the era of the true Beatles. I didn't like what happened to their music, their look, or their message, so I stopped being a fan in the early 70s. Now it all comes clear. |
|
|
|
Post by dmystified on May 20, 2011 19:53:10 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by lexdyksic on Mar 4, 2012 7:43:55 GMT
Nice work. It is obvious when compared. When this happened it wasn't quite so obvious. Without the tours and daily interviews it must have been relatively easy. Of course they had a LOT of people close to them who must have known the truth.
You would think with a group like that that someone would have blown the whistle. When everything seemed to be falling apart at Apple someone would have given an interview. It's very hard to keep a secret like this.
But, there it is! Maybe people just see what they want to see. There is absolutely no doubt that Faul is a different person. Maybe the "cash cow' aspect of it kept them all quiet. I don't know. It is all as mysterious as the lyrics themselves.
|
|
Or could Linda just be a handy "new name"?
