|
Post by Moped on May 1, 2005 14:59:05 GMT
Moped, Fantastic work! It really shows the difference in height. Bill towers over everyone! The stairs do make an excellent comparison line, but thank you for the red line.....the one showing Bill as being the tallest of the group. Thanks ;D but I didn't put the red line on there, I got the animation from some PID "debunking" site and it had the red line on there already. The scene was filmed at a slant to shorten the appearance of Faul...whoever put that red line on there drew a perfectly horizontal line across a slanted scene as evidence that Bill isn't taller. Unbelievable... Here's a still from the original animation, complete with wacky stairs and Fab Four doing the vertigo dance: So I simply rotated it to level, and the red line rotated with it:
|
|
|
Post by Michelle66 on May 2, 2005 15:05:57 GMT
This is another photo of Paul with his father Jim.
|
|
Skydeli
Contributor
food for thought
Posts: 43
|
Post by Skydeli on May 2, 2005 16:35:33 GMT
Great photo! Lets just face the facts..James Paul was short like his dad...the other photos of Faul with the family are just amazingly different and I dont care if you can't see thier feet! Faul is noticebly much taller! JP's one attribute he obviously gained from his own father genes is that he's a small man. Plain and simple, black and white. No changing my mind.
|
|
|
Post by cavendish on May 2, 2005 17:48:52 GMT
Incredible ! Thanks so much, Michelle !
|
|
|
Post by abbey on May 3, 2005 2:48:16 GMT
Good find, Michelle66! Here are photos done by SunKing last year. One is a crossfade of the first picture. Obviously, Bill is quite a bit taller than Paul was. Here's another photo of Bill & the McCartney clan:
|
|
|
Post by cavendish on May 3, 2005 13:24:16 GMT
SMA, nicely done !
|
|
|
Post by Michelle66 on May 3, 2005 14:59:47 GMT
Good find, Michelle66! Here are photos done by SunKing last year. One is a crossfade of the first picture. Obviously, Bill is quite a bit taller than Paul was. Thanks SMA. This is another photo of Bill with Jim. This one was taken in 1968 (Micheal McCartney's wedding) You can see how Bill is taller than Jim and more or less tall as Mike (who was taller than Paul).
|
|
|
Post by abbey on May 3, 2005 15:28:17 GMT
Bill towers over Jim and Jane. If Jane wore heels, she and Paul were about the same size. Bill towers over her no matter what she wears. Bill is so much taller than Jim and yet people say that PIA......wish I were an optometrist as they all need glasses ;D More photos from Mike's wedding: I wonder what Jane is standing on? Bill does appear to be about the same height as Mike. In the photo that Michelle66 posted, it's very obvious that Mike is alot taller than Paul & Jim ! Bill's resemblance to Paul in the above photo is quite striking. If it wasn't for the fact that he's so much larger than Paul was, the deception would've been complete ! Look at that These were taken the same day as the previous photo, but now you can see how much TALLER Bill is than Jane ! This is a much more accurate representation of the height difference between Bill & Jane: A later photo of Bill & Mike, showing their sameness in height : Paul's true height, from the Revolver Sessions:
|
|
|
Post by cavendish on May 3, 2005 15:47:59 GMT
Amen to that
|
|
|
Post by abbey on May 3, 2005 15:58:21 GMT
I just found this photo taken from one of the last photo sessions of Paul with the boys: It's plain to see that Paul was on the short side. Also, look how NARROW his shoulders were ! Same photo session: Check out Paul's shoes, compared to the others ! For comparison, Bill & the boys:
|
|
|
Post by Moped on May 5, 2005 12:27:10 GMT
Another deception to shorten Bill. From this, courtesy of NIR: We see Bill is actually standing in a dip in the ground:
|
|
|
Post by abbey on May 5, 2005 14:03:33 GMT
Moped, your pictures didn't come through or at least not on my end. However, you might entitle it a dipsh*t in a dip ;D ;D Everything about Bill was bigger. He had to go overboard at first to appear as short as Paul, but nothing could disguise the fact that his body in general is larger than JPM's.
|
|
|
Post by cavendish on May 5, 2005 16:03:20 GMT
Great catch, Moped ! I'm sure he either picked that spot on purpose, or someone dug that little dip so that the photos could be taken there !
|
|
|
Post by Moped on May 6, 2005 21:18:03 GMT
SMA, my image hosting sometimes has glitches with their network provider, but they've been doing OK lately...are they still not showing?
Pics are important. ;D
Cavendish, it's natural...the ground around a large tree usually gets rutted due to decades of root-growth displacing the soil, and yep they took advantage of it. Like the MMT animation, it's one of the few Faul pics where he's lined up/standing straight with George and John, so naturally they're going to use trickery...as long as the three heads appear to line up, that's what most people will notice.
If Faul wasn't taller, why would they do these things in the first place?
|
|
|
Post by abbey on May 10, 2005 14:08:09 GMT
Sorry, Moped, the pictures still are not showing. Pictures are very important. Isn't there an old saying, "A picture is worth a thousand words"? Other pictures, if I can find them, is Bill playing the bass in "Hello, Good-bye" and "I am the Walrus". He is 'strumming it at the area where the fret and the body connect. Paul never played in that area!!! Also he is playing down whereas Paul plucked upward ;D And one more little thing, Bill uses a pick and Paul didn't I have also noted several times that when you see Bill in concert, he usually is at the piano......MMMMM He seems to ignore the Hofner as much as possible......why? Because he can't play it and people are starting to comment ;D ;D ;D Is there such a thing as a haunted guitar. Where is Poe when you need him for a story called, "The Tell Tale Guitar"
|
|
|
Post by LovelyJulia on May 10, 2005 23:43:52 GMT
Unbelievable that they would resort to so many tricks to conceal Faul's true height
|
|
|
Post by Moped on May 11, 2005 13:01:03 GMT
You can see Paul's clearly wearing lifts here:
|
|
|
Post by Moped on May 11, 2005 13:19:51 GMT
Unbelievable that they would resort to so many tricks to conceal Faul's true height There are also pre67 photos out there rotated to make Paul appear taller. It looks like our friends took steps to "correct" this one:This is another photo of Paul with his father Jim.
|
|
|
Post by cavendish on May 11, 2005 14:39:53 GMT
I read that thread & it made me feel sick I have to truly wonder about what motivates those people. Are they on "the payroll" ? Faul's, EMI'S ? Who can say. All I know is that they go out of their way to change original documents to reflect their POV !
|
|
|
Post by abbey on Jul 5, 2005 16:12:16 GMT
Bumpity bump
|
|
|
Post by The Taxman on Jul 6, 2005 19:40:09 GMT
SMA...quite right...and as they see more of our discoveries, they shall spend more time covering them. I do believe that they feel invulnerable to anything, especially invasions by what they consider amateurs such as we. Fear not...the day of reckoning is almost here. Soon, very soon.
|
|
zakrandalls
Contributor
I love your feet, baby!
Posts: 14
|
Post by zakrandalls on May 26, 2007 0:20:03 GMT
it makes me laugh to see how much that head has grown...but also the face is COMPLETELY DIFFERENT!
|
|
|
Post by tkp66 on May 26, 2007 0:52:23 GMT
Here is one from '66 notice the height here as well.
|
|
|
Post by yesterday on May 31, 2008 21:52:00 GMT
I don't think these pictures really prove a height difference. In the first photo with him and his dad, Jim looks like he is putting his head head up and standing on his toes so he could be in the photo. In the Sgt.Pepper photo John appears to be bent over or slouching. And in the other photo George appears to be the tallest, although we know he is not, so I don't these pictures could be used to prove anything.
|
|
|
Post by Sun King™ on Jun 4, 2008 16:52:48 GMT
...And in the other photo George appears to be the tallest, although we know he is not, so I don't these pictures could be used to prove anything. Scientific thread. Congratulations
|
|