|
|
Post by ironmask on Oct 14, 2005 4:58:26 GMT
I just don't know about this latest "revelation".
At least one person has said there may be three Paul's. Is this possible? Perhaps Neil impersonated Paul at some point but not always?
But according to this scenario: Neil replaced Paul and someone replaced Neil. Who?
I've always wondered about Tara Browne, whether he was really killed or he permanently replaced someone himself. Just a thought. Where's a Tara Browne picture?
|
|
|
|
Post by BeatlePaul on Oct 14, 2005 11:38:40 GMT
...although NOW I can see a great resemblance between the two guys I've never seen before.... ... so are they the real TWIN FREAKS |
|
|
|
Post by BeatlePaul on Oct 14, 2005 19:23:03 GMT
 Sgt. Bill... that mouth ...WHERE I saw before that mouth... I am hearing now John singing: Strawberry Fiels.... FOREVER |
|
|
|
Post by andrewexelor on Oct 14, 2005 21:06:29 GMT
dont ban me...but
youve gone too far. he wasnt replaced with neil. he was replaced with billy shears. your breaking common belief of 60if
|
|
|
|
Post by BeatlePaul on Oct 14, 2005 21:21:50 GMT
dont ban me...but youve gone too far. he wasnt replaced with neil. he was replaced with billy shears. your breaking common belief of 60if Ah.... don't worry I am no more the admin here... ... so I couldn't ban you.... ;D We don't know if "Neil Aspinall" is a fantasy name or not. I am fully convinced that he was "our" so called Billy Pepper alias Billy Shepherd |
|
|
|
Post by andrewexelor on Oct 14, 2005 23:07:35 GMT
maybe its a ....feilograph! lol
|
|
|
|
Post by plastic paul on Oct 15, 2005 0:05:06 GMT
I'm no more sure than this than i am of anything anymore, it could be neil but i don't know, one thing i will say of neil though is that his eyes are a fair distance apart...
|
|
|
|
Post by BeatlePaul on Oct 15, 2005 9:36:37 GMT
I'm no more sure than this than i am of anything anymore, it could be neil but i don't know, one thing i will say of neil though is that his eyes are a fair distance apart... Are you sure? That guy IS our "Sgt. Pepper" |
|
|
|
Post by TotalInformation on Oct 15, 2005 17:10:24 GMT
How about a Neil / Billy Pepper (from the pepperpots LP) fade?
|
|
|
|
Post by plastic paul on Oct 15, 2005 22:59:49 GMT
Ok BP, but Sgt. Pepper faul is not the same guy as later faul, and it does back the theory that aspinal covered for Paul for a brief period but isn't faul if u know what i mean, or is that just what you were saying anyway?
|
|
|
|
Post by BeatlePaul on Oct 16, 2005 0:04:04 GMT
How about a Neil / Billy Pepper (from the pepperpots LP) fade? ... exactly.... Welcome back Total! |
|
|
|
Post by BeatlePaul on Oct 16, 2005 0:07:22 GMT
Ok BP, but Sgt. Pepper faul is not the same guy as later faul, and it does back the theory that aspinal covered for Paul for a brief period but isn't faul if u know what i mean, or is that just what you were saying anyway?
Olivia Harrison www.beatlebrunch.com/Features/Frangione/georgeinducted2.html Shear Neil's eyebrows and you'll find that... The answer to all your questions |
|
Maacc
Contributor
Hail Hail
Posts: 89
|
Post by Maacc on Oct 16, 2005 9:18:38 GMT
So there was no Billy Shepherd? So all the related clues are bogus then? I find that hard to believe in light of Bunglaow Bill etc. IMO the story doesn't really make sense, and Aspinall doesn't bear any resemblance to Paul. Maybe I just don't get it?
|
|
|
|
Post by BeatlePaul on Oct 16, 2005 10:29:40 GMT
So there was no Billy Shepherd? So all the related clues are bogus then? I find that hard to believe in light of Bunglaow Bill etc. IMO the story doesn't really make sense, and Aspinall doesn't bear any resemblance to Paul. Maybe I just don't get it? There was no Neil Aspinall. Was it a fantasy name? |
|
|
|
Post by Perplexed on Oct 16, 2005 10:46:30 GMT
So there was no Billy Shepherd? So all the related clues are bogus then? I find that hard to believe in light of Bunglaow Bill etc. IMO the story doesn't really make sense, and Aspinall doesn't bear any resemblance to Paul. Maybe I just don't get it? You know my name. Look up, look up, the num---bah-uh-uh. You know my nay-ay-ayme. Loo-loo-look---up, my numbah........ Well, is it "9"? John Lennon was intrigued with the number nine. Why? |
|
|
|
Post by TotalInformation on Oct 16, 2005 19:08:32 GMT
How about a Neil / Billy Pepper (from the pepperpots LP) fade?
... exactly....
Exactly what? Where's the fade?
------------------------------------------------------------------
So there was no Billy Shepherd? So all the related clues are bogus then? I find that hard to believe in light of Bunglaow Bill et
Billy Shepherd was a pen name made up by JPM before he died. Its basis is in the Shake-speare scam.
|
|
|
|
Post by BeatlePaul on Oct 16, 2005 19:10:24 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by BeatlePaul on Oct 16, 2005 20:17:02 GMT
How about a Neil / Billy Pepper (from the pepperpots LP) fade?
... exactly.... Exactly what? Where's the fade? .... here it is ... |
|
|
|
Post by emuri99 on Oct 17, 2005 0:01:39 GMT
They look nothing alike.  |
|
|
|
Post by BeatlePaul on Oct 17, 2005 9:19:45 GMT
They look nothing alike. Are you sure? |
|
|
|
Post by plastic paul on Oct 17, 2005 12:54:02 GMT
Now for the first time in this thread i find this genuinely convincing, but i'm not totally sold yet! BTW i cant speak for emuri but i think he/she was joking. |
|
|
|
Post by BeatlePaul on Oct 17, 2005 13:24:08 GMT
Now for the first time in this thread i find this genuinely convincing, but i'm not totally sold yet! BTW i cant speak for emuri but i think he/she was joking. At the beginning it was my "sin" too ... thinking of it just impossible Thanks to the admin that provided me that photo. If you can wait there is more to come yet....  |
|
Maacc
Contributor
Hail Hail
Posts: 89
|
Post by Maacc on Oct 17, 2005 20:07:18 GMT
I just don't see it, and I want a chronology of suggested events if possible to put some flesh on this.
Eg You've got a comparison of Faul and Neil above, yet you say that he only filled for Faul temporarily - what will a comparison of Aspinall with the present day Faul show? Clearly I'm still missing something, and I don't want to agree just for the sake of it. After all, that really would be an illustration of the The King is Naked's moral.
I think the thing I find hardest to accept is that after thousands of posts on the subject, we're ditching the Canadian Billy Shears theory, despite all the obvious tie ins. It's a lot of work (and arguments) to push aside.
|
|
|
|
Post by defhermit on Oct 17, 2005 20:09:26 GMT
Maacc = Macca?
|
|
|
|
Post by BeatlePaul on Oct 17, 2005 20:44:01 GMT
Eg You've got a comparison of Faul and Neil above, yet you say that he only filled for Faul temporarily - what will a comparison of Aspinall with the present day Faul show? It's just above your post. You just DON'T SEE this forum No one has stated that Bill/Neil "only" filled for Faul temporarily. Bill/Neil was from November 1966 and still is our Faul Clearly I'm still missing something, and I don't want to agree just for the sake of it. After all, that really would be an illustration of the The King is Naked's moral. Again you just don't see this forum. Sorry who doesn't see the forum just can't post... I think the thing I find hardest to accept is that after thousands of posts on the subject, we're ditching the Canadian Billy Shears theory, despite all the obvious tie ins. It's a lot of work (and arguments) to push aside. If you go there: 1966.proboards40.com/index.cgi?action=display&board=general&thread=1129413941&page=1#1129413941you CAN SEE (I hope) Sgt. Billy/Neil Shepherd/Aspinall on Beatles security action. Being For The Benefit of Mr. Kite |
|
