Paul hired a replacement in '66

[BillyJones]

LUCY you weren't wrong.They DID slant the photo !!! Ringo might very well be trying to boost his height. Not that it worked any. He STILL looks alot shorter than Faul. Here's a photo of Ringo standing next to JPM for comparison. The snowscene from Help !!! :



Even with Ritchie wearing a hat, you can see that Paul is no more than a couple of inches taller than him. They were all wearing snow boots. Paul IS tilting his head upwards a little. Compare their left shoulders. I'd guestimate that Paul is no more than 3 inches taller than Ritchie in this photo. Paul's hair also looks puffed up on top...

Now some photos from the Tittenhurst photo shoot:





An even better photo of John, Paul & Ringo circa 1963:



Now you tell me how Paul & Faul can be the same man !!!

Chris

[LUCY]

thinking about the other photos I've seen from this session: George was also photographed in this hat, and, if memory serves, the hat was not the same, as in the particular "cowboy" style.........I think it's a dead end......?

[Scatterdome]

LUCY said:

another slanted floor scenerio. Could Ringo be boosting himself up w/ his heels on the doorway threshold? He seems flush against the wall...and the hat? could it be the very one JPM was wearing in other photos? ( the "cowboy"one that Billy Jay way likes to oft post)

Yeah, Faul is towering over Ringo in the “hat” photo… good work!

LUCY said:

thinking about the other photos I've seen from this session: George was also photographed in this hat, and, if memory serves, the hat was not the same, as in the particular "cowboy" style.........I think it's a dead end......?

I don't think it's a dead end, Lucy... now that you've brought up the cowboy hat, I’m seeing another theme here:

I think these two clues have an extremely similar theme, whether under my theory or PID: In the “I Am The Walrus” video, the band is performing alongside an empty pair of shoes onstage.

“PID” proponents could interpret both of these clues as death clues, but I have another interpretation:

I think that both clues mean that James Paul is the “invisible Beatle,” not the “dead Beatle!” Look at it with fresh eyes, everyone, and you might see it…

What’s that? The drum says “Love the 3 Beatles?” Hmmm… If you look at the drum as is, the so-called “3” is actually a “3-with-an-unexplained-squiggle-attached-to-the-numeral.” To me, something’s not quite right with saying that it’s just a 3; the squiggle suggests that the Beatles want us to look at it a little closer, a little different, until the squiggle is explained…

Look what happens when you put the drum in a mirror and rotate it a bit:

www.scatterdome.com/images/walrus clip.jpg[/img]www.scatterdome.com/images/walrus clip flip.JPG[/img]

Another “5!”

And there’s no unexplained squiggle!

Bill said:

James - you have ALOT of class & you're correct. I am of the opinion that Paul was taken from us back in 1966. However, I think it's a brilliant idea for you to have your own message board. Your theory will further expose people to the fact that Faul is NOT the original JPM !!!
The more the merrier, I always say ;D

Thank you… I’ll try to get the Beatles forum up soon, but first I have to condense my 200 posts into an easy-to-read page: quite a daunting task, considering the average length of my posts!! I’ll probably end up posting many links to the threads where I’ve posted on this forum, instead of re-typing all my main points. It’ll have some photos, and a general outline of my theory, but the in-detail meat of the theory will originally have to consist of links to this forum, or else it would take me several months!

But before I can even do any of that, I first must focus on nurturing and advertising my brand-new crop circle forum, as my crop circle essay just won Steve Jackson Games’ “Illuminated Site Of The Week” on 7/26. ( www.sjgames.com/ill/illsotw ) In regards to the crop circle essay, I must “strike while the iron is hot,” especially THIS week, if I want my new crop circle forum to get a strong start.

But make no mistake—when I’ve done what I need to do regarding my new crop circle forum and my crop circle essay, I will then focus on getting my Faul theory written into an essay on my home page. And after that, I will definitely be ready to create and advertise a Beatles/Faul forum. (Yikes, I’ve sure got my work cut out for me…)

Until then, hang tight!

[BillyJones]

James - I wish you the best of luck, I really do.
Upon looking at the drum, I can't seem to find the "3", HELP !!!

Chris

[BillyJones]

I found another photo of John from their Dude Ranch trip. Here it is:



A photo of the 4 of them at the Dude Ranch:



Another Tittenhurst photo:



Again, Paul in his hat:



Now, a closeup of the statue with the hat on it:



I have to say that after examining these photos, LUCY is right. It IS a dead end.

It appears that John & George were wearing different cowboy hats at the Dude Ranch than they wore at Tittenhurst ...

Oh well...

Chris

[Delta]

Scatterdome said:

But before I can even do any of that, I first must focus on nurturing and advertising my brand-new crop circle forum, as my crop circle essay just won Steve Jackson Games’ “Illuminated Site Of The Week” on 7/26. ( www.sjgames.com/ill/illsotw ) In regards to the crop circle essay, I must “strike while the iron is hot,” especially THIS week, if I want my new crop circle forum to get a strong start.

congratulations and good luck!

[LUCY]

hmmmmmmmm
a homage to the missing one? george WAS wearing it in an earlier/or/later part of the shoot. pull up THAT photo and compare?
or, simply, symbolic- much more convienient.

[LUCY]

Scatterdome said:

Yeah, Faul is towering over Ringo in the “hat” photo… good work!

I don't think it's a dead end, Lucy... now that you've brought up the cowboy hat, I’m seeing another theme here:

I think these two clues have an extremely similar theme, whether under my theory or PID: In the “I Am The Walrus” video, the band is performing alongside an empty pair of shoes onstage.!

well this wouldn't be the first time John used the the cymbals as a pun on words. An interview w/ Victor Spinnetti provides an anedote
about John saying something about "fingering me (c) symbols"
I can't rember the exact context, something about someone messing w/the drums on a shoot. So the bloody shoes under the cymbals is really much of a stretch..............

[The Taxman]

Delta, having only come on board recently I don't wish to be too pointed about all this but I can tell you: the man you see now is NOT Paul McCartney, and the real one one most assuredly is dead, sadly. As for Paul hiring his own replacement...

[Delta]

'xcuse me? what was it i said?

[Michelle66]

Scatterdome said:

James Paul McCartney was born in 1942, while the three known members or Klaatu were born in 1951, so basically, if my theory is correct, he would’ve been the “old man” of the group! (Does the cane mean anything too, in light of what Chris just posted before this? ........)

It took me some time to read the whole thread. I still think Paul died in 1966, but I noticed something about the old man: he is holding the cane with his left hand.

[Scatterdome]

Hello everyone. I’ve been taking a break from the Paul McCartney thing for a while now; satisfied that I’ve gotten enough of the word out on my theory, I’ve been spending my time & energy on other personal obligations, including my continuing work with crop circles.

However, when I found this mind-blowing article ( www.goroadachi.com/etemenanki/blog-05july.htm#070805 ) on David Icke’s Headlines page ( www.davidicke.com/icke/headlines.php ) I knew I had to share it on this thread. The article deals with the Mayan calendar, the Illuminati, the mysterious and powerful forces opposing the Illuminati, and most importantly, how “Paul McCartney” fits into the big picture. (After reading this, it will be no wonder to anyone why there are so many creepy disinformation agents haunting this forum— the true story of “Paul” is a heavy issue indeed.)

This article may be tough to follow for those who are unfamiliar with both the Mayan Calendar and the Illuminati’s obsession with ritual symbolism; familiarity with at least one of those two subjects will provide an access point.

One important note: merely skimming over this article could result in the incorrect impression that “billy McCartney” is working for the Illuminati. However, reading the article fully, especially the segments on Live 8 and Paul McCartney, will instead reveal that not only is Faul working for the “good guys,” he’s actually an important and highly symbolic key player in the global drama of the years leading up to 2012!

This article not only provides unique insight into how Faul fits into the big picture, it also provides insight into the Matrix itself in light of extremely recent events, specifically in the period between 6/28/05 and today. (7/16/05.) Don’t put off reading this article, as it’s best understood while these recent events are fresh in one’s head.

Here’s an excerpt to give you an idea of what you are about to read:

I will delve into the incredible cipher system of the Super Bowl in the near future but here it is enough to point out two things: McCartney wearing a shirt with a 5-pointed star on the chest, and the 'coded' meaning of his name.
A 5-pointed star traditionally signifies Venus (as well as Sirius), the goddess star, and thus naturally also Mary Magdalene and such. So that's the entry point of the cipher - letting us know that there is something going on here. Then as we look at 'Paul McCartney' we get the idea that it's also a 'Paul star' or 'pole star' (Polaris). This is confirmed by his last name 'McCartney' meaning 'son of the bear', as in Ursa Minor the 'Little Bear' constellation, to which the Pole Star belongs.

A meridional great circle, or the 'fire colure', necessarily goes through the poles, but there are two amazing further correlations employed here. One is that the function of stopping the Flood water ascribed to the Benben/Omphalos Stone, which is a capstone or in effect a 'pole stone' symbolically used to pinpoint the Sumatran Great Flood, was also given to the Pole Star. As noted in Hamlet's Mill (p.219):
According to the Mongolians, the Pole star is "a pillar from the firm standing of which depends the correct revolving of the world, or a stone which closes an opening; if the stone is pulled out, water pours out of the opening to submerge the earth."

Here is the link to the article:

www.goroadachi.com/etemenanki/blog-05july.htm#070805

After reading the article, consider the “solo Paul” song titles: “1985,” “Venus & Mars,” “Figure of Eight,” and most amazingly: “SPINNING ON AN AXIS!”

Lastly, for those who aren’t familiar with my writings outside of this forum and would like to verify that I am not a disinformation agent, I recommend checking out my essay on the decoding of the 7/03 Howell, MI crop formation at:
www.scatterdome.com/howell.htm

[byrdsmaniac]

Scatterdome, Thanks for the update. You're never at
a loss for words!

[abbey]

Thank you, Scatterdome, for link to David Icke

[TheDZ]

(After reading this, it will be no wonder to anyone why there are so many creepy disinformation agents haunting this forum— the true story of “Paul” is a heavy issue indeed.)

Your posts are highly insightful, Scatterdome.
I am glad to see you return..

Thanks for the links..here's one of my perrenial favorites.

[Paulythene Paul]

scatterdome said:

www.klaatu.org/ (click on "the music", then select "California Jam") from the music samples

James Paul... plays bass in his distinctive style and sings just the aforementioned one-word vocal cameo in “California Jam,” ("California") with the intention of providing a MAJOR clue…

I listened to it, Scatterdome. It is not James Paul. The person singing "California" at the end of the clip is the same singer who is also singing earlier in the song, "California's on my mind. Circumstance sitting in the sun." It sounds like one of the members of Klaatu doing an imitation of James Paul doing an imitation of Marvin Gaye.

Thanks for introducing me to the Klaatu.org site. I've never really listened to their first album very much, and I must say I enjoyed that track. It sounds rather like a Brian Wilson production, if you ask me.

Anyhow, back to the main point, I'm sorry, Scatterdome, but I don't agree with this Klaatu element of your theory. I do, however, hope you are right that James Paul lived on long beyond the time that he disappeared in late 1966. I don't think you're right, but it would be nice if you were about James Paul McCartney having lived on.

[ccinri]

There are groups in the Gnostic faith that speak of light and dark entities. ...that the negativity on this planet is worse than anywhere else in the universe, Scatterdome refers to the Illumanti for example. The Beatles sang about love and were able to find a positive bottom line for an enormous amount of people to form a connection (church/religion like). Their power was unmatched by any other kind of celebrity. John spoke about the subtleties of protest and how love could throw "negative" people for a loop because they could't attack it...at least not publically. Unfortunately, so many people are plugged into TV and are kept entranced by a daily dose of controlling pabulum they have stopped seeing. It seems to me that the Beatles faced true darkness and found a way to get around it, and spent the rest of their lives trying to get us to see. It's refreshing to read so many people who are really looking and asking questions.

[plastic paul]

Lovely post, I concur.

[Perplexed]

If I had had to face Manilla in the Phillipines, John's Jesus disaster,
Brian's Dizz Gillespie mess, etc et al, I might want to dip out of sight as soon as my contract was up, too. Maybe Paul needed to just get out of all of it. Could not blame him.

[rhye]

you've got a point here .. but according to this

www.youtube.com/watch?v=2uDrbv_GPIA&feature=related
www.youtube.com/watch?v=LgV1XIxnyA4&feature=related

and other stuff I can't find right now, Paul seemed to be the one that more then any other Beatle wanted to go on with touring and stuff .. still I don't know ..

Brian's Dizz Gillespie mess

what's that?

[khamira]

Kinda hard to accept that PAUL is REALLY DEAD/MURDERED, isnt it?

[jpsams]

Sir ;
The photo that I have looked at whereas the band members are affront of a sight claiming to be the burial grounds with a unknown head piece that wears a hat seems to have its jewish connotations . Please notice John Lennon as his stance and garments worn, really seems to indicate to me that this is someone whom is sharing with his audience some applications that may benchmark a decorous stream of a certain belief , possibly of the jewish faith . Could it be possible that Lennon was addressing to the " goyim " his version of the emperors apparel . Was not Brian Epstein of jewish signature ? There seems to be to me anyhow , that there is more to consider here in this photo than it presents itself .

[robs]

I think the hypothesis Paul staged his own exit is very plausible. One thing that would have made this worked both before and after the breakup is that the real Paul could have slipped in and out as himself anytime, as long as Faul wasn't immediately around. Also this would have been a protected inner circle thing, and would perfectly explain the quality of the post '66 music and McCartney's solo career. Has anyone confirmed that the original John Paul is see at the end of Yellow Submarine? That certainly looks like the original, especially the delicate hand and face shape. Also what about the early Paul character in the Coming Up video? It looks like him to me. These are to me the two clearest indications that Paul lived after 1966. There was also the engagement party of Jane Asher where Linda was told of the "other Paul" What happened to her, as one would assume Paul going into hiding would almost require him to be in a monogamous relation with someone he trusted. Could she have gotten her own double to disappear with him?

I know I'm late coming to this, but Congratulations on a great theory Scatterdome. I wish it would be further explored.

[Sun King™]

Jan 15, 2012 3:28:58 GMT robs said:

I think the hypothesis Paul staged his own exit is very plausible. One thing that would have made this worked both before and after the breakup is that the real Paul could have slipped in and out as himself anytime, as long as Faul wasn't immediately around. Also this would have been a protected inner circle thing, and would perfectly explain the quality of the post '66 music and McCartney's solo career. Has anyone confirmed that the original John Paul is see at the end of Yellow Submarine? That certainly looks like the original, especially the delicate hand and face shape. Also what about the early Paul character in the Coming Up video? It looks like him to me. These are to me the two clearest indications that Paul lived after 1966. There was also the engagement party of Jane Asher where Linda was told of the "other Paul" What happened to her, as one would assume Paul going into hiding would almost require him to be in a monogamous relation with someone he trusted. Could she have gotten her own double to disappear with him?

I know I'm late coming to this, but Congratulations on a great theory Scatterdome. I wish it would be further explored.

The "Paul" you tell at the end of Yellow Submarine is like the original one? (above)

[Deleted]

The yellow submarine segment was filmed
January 25th, 1968


Faul is always Paul McCartney after 1966. He solely holds the role to this day.
There is no reappearance of James Paul McCartney as Paul after 1966