|
|
Post by ironmask on Oct 21, 2005 12:18:03 GMT
BP, I think there's a lot of confusion about how this deal went down. Why don't you put up a rough timeline showing what you think happened. I can only speak for myself, but I still don't understand what you're trying to say. None of the permutations I can think of make any sense, so any help would be appreciated. It would be relatively easy to check whether or not there was a Neil Aspinall at Liverpool Institute. Unless, of course, you only find there what you are supposed to find. Faking a record is easy. |
|
|
|
Post by BeatlePaul on Oct 21, 2005 12:50:26 GMT
BP, I think there's a lot of confusion about how this deal went down. Why don't you put up a rough timeline showing what you think happened. I can only speak for myself, but I still don't understand what you're trying to say. None of the permutations I can think of make any sense, so any help would be appreciated. It would be relatively easy to check whether or not there was a Neil Aspinall at Liverpool Institute. No confusion here. At last ALL is clear. The REAL confusion is on Mark Lewinsohn Chronology, WHERE ( e. g. ) it was reported that John cutted his hair for the film "How I won the war" on September 5th. John and Faux-Neil at Paris Airport on September 18th. If you want to talk about CONFUSION so ask Mark Lewinsohn who wrote the so called "OFFICIAL" Beatles Chronology. |
|
TheDZ
Provocative Operator 
Posts: 435
|
Post by TheDZ on Oct 23, 2005 4:45:33 GMT
Well I did a compare..I matched the irises the best I could.. The Hey Jude pic is a bit grainy..  Seems alright..nose matches..eye width matches..general face shape matches.. They certainly had some accomplished makeup artists.. |
|
|
|
Post by BeatlePaul on Oct 25, 2005 10:42:02 GMT
Here is the answer "someone" would wait for. Do you remember this picture? Well .... Faul (on 1975) was wearing a cap-wig. Here is the attach line. That on the White Album Poster was about Bill/Neil AFTER / BEFORE a make-up session. |
|
Maacc
Contributor
Hail Hail
Posts: 89
|
Post by Maacc on Oct 25, 2005 10:54:40 GMT
I'm sorry, but I think this is wrong. I don't see ithe resemblance myself, and the comparisons look like two completely different people. What do the rest of you think?
|
|
|
|
Post by BeatlePaul on Oct 25, 2005 11:00:19 GMT
I'm sorry, but I think this is wrong. I don't see ithe resemblance myself, and the comparisons look like two completely different people. What do the rest of you think? Math Physics and Biology are not an opinion. |
|
|
|
Post by BeatlePaul on Oct 27, 2005 13:27:28 GMT
I need a little help from my friends.... WHERE I have seen that face before? |
|
Dr.No
Contributor
Posts: 177
|
Post by Dr.No on Oct 28, 2005 4:09:15 GMT
I'm sorry, but I think this is wrong. I don't see ithe resemblance myself, and the comparisons look like two completely different people. What do the rest of you think? Math Physics and Biology are not an opinion. what are you talking about?! |
|
|
|
Post by Perplexed on Oct 28, 2005 7:34:34 GMT
I need a little help from my friends.... WHERE I have seen that face before? Strawberry Fields video. ? So, hmm. Confusing. |
|
|
|
Post by ironmask on Oct 28, 2005 7:45:56 GMT
I thought it looked a bit like Denny Laine!
|
|
|
|
Post by Perplexed on Oct 28, 2005 8:29:10 GMT
WHERE I have we that face before? |
|
|
|
Post by BeatlePaul on Oct 28, 2005 10:29:49 GMT
I need a little help from my friends.... WHERE I have seen that face before? Strawberry Fields video. ? So, hmm. Confusing. Right. It was from Strawberry Fields video No confusion. You just have to look at the video. You, Perplexed, told that many videos were refilmed. You were right. There is a big evidence for that. |
|
|
|
Post by ironmask on Oct 29, 2005 7:45:21 GMT
Refilemed because originally it was going to be Denny Laine replacing Paul. So at least two versions out there? One with Denny and one with Billy? Or a mixture?
Denny Laine is in my ears and in my eyes...
|
|
|
|
Post by BeatlePaul on Oct 29, 2005 8:44:54 GMT
Refilemed because originally it was going to be Denny Laine replacing Paul. So at least two versions out there? One with Denny and one with Billy? Or a mixture? Denny Laine is in my ears and in my eyes... What on the Anthology Collection was with Neil/Billy. But I can understand if you are so confused... As ALREADY told in this forum Denny was "just" the other "Faul" candidate. |
|
|
|
Post by plastic paul on Oct 30, 2005 0:59:20 GMT
Ok yes BP they are definitely two separate people but; "denny laine is in my ears and in my eyes" What if (those crucial words!!!), for some pictures they used a combination of denny and neil/bill to create an accurate paul look........? That could explain the white album "two paul's/denny" photo.... Probably gonna be ridiculed but hey! |
|
|
|
Post by JamesPaul & Brian on Oct 30, 2005 1:37:10 GMT
Ok yes BP they are definitely two separate people but; "denny laine is in my ears and in my eyes" What if (those crucial words!!!), for some pictures they used a combination of denny and neil/bill to create an accurate paul look........? That could explain the white album "two paul's/denny" photo.... Yes....and not only about the image. Maybe blending Denny and Bill's voices too. Is that why Denny continued to work with "Faul" in Wings, to continue the sound and feel that was already familiar? |
|
moped
Contributor
Posts: 115 
|
Post by moped on Nov 5, 2005 14:48:18 GMT
This is Neil?  |
|
|
|
Post by BeatlePaul on Nov 6, 2005 2:22:49 GMT
This is Neil?  Not at all... I know what you are referring to...  |
|
|
|
Post by maryjane on Nov 21, 2005 23:11:36 GMT
I believe I'd heard Neil was too short, sorry. The shape of the chin and jawline is also wrong.
|
|
|
|
Post by plastic paul on Nov 21, 2005 23:47:22 GMT
Thanks, that really helps...
|
|
|
|
Post by BeatlePaul on Nov 22, 2005 8:33:19 GMT
I believe I'd heard Neil was too short, sorry. The shape of the chin and jawline is also wrong. You mean: the true Neil to be Faul. No problem with the chin because Faul's one is "so" shape shifter.... Sorry |
|
|
|
Post by maryjane on Dec 24, 2005 21:28:56 GMT
Just how did Neil get rid of his lantern jaw? Faul's seems a lot shorter and more receding in many photos. Faul's forehead is higher too. And if Neil could sing, would he keep it a secret? Please check out my posts on the general board.
|
|
|
|
Post by Sun King™ on Jul 22, 2006 19:11:49 GMT
Hello Fred (Williamson), I do need your magic ... for an interview... Soon, please...... "Sunday's on the phone to Monday,
Tuesday's on the phone to me
Oh yeah." |
|
Soothsayer
Contributor
A knight at the crossroads
Posts: 135 
|
Post by Soothsayer on Jul 22, 2006 23:27:02 GMT
More often than not, the clues in the whole PID scenario, are vague & open to interpretation/misinterpretation. I was under the impression, that it is the goal of this forum to investigate these said clues, & reach a common ground, with regards to the circumstances surrounding the replacement of JPM in 1966, which is the general belief. I find it very unhelpful & frustrating, to be honest, when highly respected and clearly knowledgeable, members of this site, take it upon themselves to provide us with a whole new batch of cryptic clues & little snippets of info, that are not entirely/easily clarified, or identifiable. Time & time again, this neil/billy concept is repeatedly the sole issue that seems to throw the forum into chaos, & create doubt amongst the most loyal & ardent champions to the cause. If we are all batting for the same team,(?) & united in the quest for justice for JPM, John, & everyone else that has suffered, can we please have some straight answers, backed up with some conclusive, easy to interpret, documentary/visual evidence &/or references.. (just for the thickos, like myself, that are still coming to terms with the enormity of this bizarre issue & want to get the facts straight in our simple minds..  ) Just my humble 2 penneth, respect 2 all. Sooth. |
|
|
|
Post by Forum Manager on Jul 23, 2006 1:41:24 GMT
More often than not, the clues in the whole PID scenario, are vague & open to interpretation/misinterpretation. I was under the impression, that it is the goal of this forum to investigate these said clues, & reach a common ground, with regards to the circumstances surrounding the replacement of JPM in 1966, which is the general belief. I find it very unhelpful & frustrating, to be honest, when highly respected and clearly knowledgeable, members of this site, take it upon themselves to provide us with a whole new batch of cryptic clues & little snippets of info, that are not entirely/easily clarified, or identifiable. Time & time again, this neil/billy concept is repeatedly the sole issue that seems to throw the forum into chaos, & create doubt amongst the most loyal & ardent champions to the cause. If we are all batting for the same team,(?) & united in the quest for justice for JPM, John, & everyone else that has suffered, can we please have some straight answers, backed up with some conclusive, easy to interpret, documentary/visual evidence &/or references.. (just for the thickos, like myself, that are still coming to terms with the enormity of this bizarre issue & want to get the facts straight in our simple minds.. ) Just my humble 2 penneth, respect 2 all. Sooth. Soothsayer you haven't been here too long, but this forum has seen chaos on many different topics not just this one. Usually it goes back to members having personal differences, criticizing someone's posting style, baiting others to take sides and so on. With that said, there are many other topics here that provoke controversy. I don't know why comparisons of Billy and Neil should be "the sole issue" creating doubt and chaos, can you explain why you think it is such a problem? |
|
) Just my humble 2 penneth, respect 2 all. Sooth.