|
Post by abbey on Oct 17, 2004 18:29:18 GMT
Some people think that it's a spoof on us. I'm not so sure. There is a heavy M4E presence there. The people who set it up feel that Eric was told by George what happened to Paul. Once the powers that be found out about this, Eric was killed & replaced also. I've looked at quite a few photos of Eric before the late 1960's. He looks like a different man than the Eric Clapton of 1970 onwards ! Take a look & see for yourselves. Here's a link to it. claptongone.proboards30.com/index.cgi
|
|
|
Post by PaulBearer on Oct 18, 2004 6:55:51 GMT
Nah! It's a spoof!
|
|
|
Post by Delta on Oct 19, 2004 22:14:10 GMT
i'd say, if it's a spoof, it's a pretty good one. of course there are some people there we have also come across on this board. but apart from them, the discussions look genuine to me. plus, i can see the possibility of clapton being replaced. i think i'm going to look up some pictures , because i'm not familiar with the clapton of the 60's.
what i'm wondering, if this is indeed true, is: which clapton is playing on the white album? the real one or the fake one?
|
|
|
Post by Power 2 The People on Oct 20, 2004 0:14:40 GMT
I thinks it's fake. There's practically no activity there except by trolls.
|
|
|
Post by gracemer on Oct 22, 2004 22:52:08 GMT
Does anyone think Patti would marry a fake Clapton? Wouldn't George have clued her in in an attempt to keep her?
|
|
|
Post by PaulBearer on Oct 23, 2004 2:12:33 GMT
Maybe that's the point. I don't know the timeline but off the top of my head I would say that maybe Patti had no interest in Clapton but was attracted to his impersonator.
It seems pretty clear to me that the site is meant as a spoof by some of the early comments of the supposed differences between Eric and Feric.
For instance they talk about how Eric and Feric stand differently in front of the microphone when it seems obvious to me the reason for the different stance is because the the microphone is set at different heights. Also, the claim is made that Eric has his eyes shut and Feric his eyes open while singing. Well, this is only one set of photos and there could easily be others photos showing the reverse. It looks like an attempt to delberately exagerate tiny things, make mountains out of molehills with the implication that that's what we do over here.
Also, there is allusion to up and coming information etc. yet to be revealed. This looks like a satire of how Sun King is sometimes perceived in the way he dishes out info.
In spite of the joking intentions of the site, they may have accidentally stumbled upon another truth - it's possible that Clapton may have really been replaced - I don't know; I don't think anyone's looked into it enough to really know and that's not our main focus here.
Faul is the big one and the key - I think when the truth of Faul comes out, the truths about other celebrity replacements may follow soon after. It's like a house of cards. Once one card falls, the whole house will collapse.
|
|
|
Post by abbey on Oct 25, 2004 14:17:27 GMT
The timeline would be interesting and I don't know it either. If Patti didn't mess around with the real Eric, then maybe the replacement was enticing to her. However, if Eric was killed because George told him the truth about Paul's death, wouldn't Patti also have known the truth and be at risk herself? Apparently, she never questioned the situation if she didn't know and that would be really odd.
However, I am sure people like Patti, Jane, and many others were threatened themselves or their families were.
|
|
|
Post by PaulBearer on Oct 25, 2004 16:05:13 GMT
|
|
|
Post by abbey on Oct 26, 2004 2:33:22 GMT
Now that does give one a pause to think. I haven't really done much on the Clapton forum. This one keeps me plenty busy.
But from what you are saying PB, it is all a spoof and there are a whole lot of M4E'ers there.
|
|
|
Post by PaulBearer on Dec 1, 2004 9:15:47 GMT
The Calpton site has gone! Just like the illuminati site recently. Looks like the spoofs are officially dead (for now).
|
|
|
Post by Delta on Dec 1, 2004 16:44:46 GMT
hurrah!
|
|
|
Post by peoplescommittee on Jan 8, 2005 23:51:38 GMT
I contacted this person known as Openmind some time ago. He's also part of the committee. He says he had nothing to do with it, but since it was a new conspiracy popping up, he felt he should include it to be fair.
|
|
|
Post by PaulBearer on Jan 9, 2005 2:17:49 GMT
Hmmmm...that openmind board is just about dead and the references to Clapton have been removed.
|
|
TheDZ
Provocative Operator
Posts: 435
|
Post by TheDZ on Mar 18, 2005 4:45:16 GMT
Eric's in the bottom left of the red yardbirds photo . Eric was a yardbird from 1963 to 1965. Same Broken Nose.... Same Mouth...Same Ears...Same Guy. IMO. Can you say ( well documented ) drug abuse...?
|
|
TheDZ
Provocative Operator
Posts: 435
|
Post by TheDZ on Mar 18, 2005 4:45:39 GMT
That's R+R Circus This is more Yardbirds, Eric on the far (our) right. now he's on our left more recent with a 'fro and Broken Nose Plainly visible With a twisted honker like that, I'm guessing that at some point Eric had surgery for a deviated septum later in his career. I still see the same man all through, although he does have a changing appearance, clothes and hair wise, and weight and age wise. Strong evidence otherwise might sway me ...better be good though!
|
|
|
Post by BeatlePaul on Mar 18, 2005 9:15:44 GMT
Those photos are absolutely about THE SAME man. I can't tell the same for the others
|
|
|
Post by abbey on Mar 18, 2005 15:28:17 GMT
He was replaced either during or BEFORE Cream. As I stated, I haven't done much research on this. However, there is noway that the man who is claiming to be Eric Clapton today is the ORIGINAL Eric Clapton. Like Paul, Eric had a small round face & a small slight build. Like Faul/Bill, Feric has a longer thinner face & is a bigger man. What I find interesting is that Faul/ Bill's eyes are closer together than Paul's were. Feric's eyes are WIDER APART than Eric's were. Go figure, eh??? Here goes: Eric: Feric: Go check it out for yourself. Google - image - Eric Clapton. They sure don't look like the same guy to me
|
|
|
Post by abbey on Mar 18, 2005 15:29:44 GMT
I have to further study the photos others have posted. The info I've read so far is very eye-opening.
|
|
|
Post by gracemer on Mar 18, 2005 23:33:39 GMT
I have to further study the photos others have posted. The info I've read so far is very eye-opening. LOL! I clicked on this because I thought it said "Clinton is dead." ;D But since I'm here.....looks like 2 different men. Amazing. More please.
|
|
|
Post by PaulBearer on Mar 18, 2005 23:49:05 GMT
a couple of weeks ago, i bought the "rock&roll circus"-dvd by the rolling stones. the recordings for this show took place late '68.
one of the acts is "yer blues" by "the dirty mac", with john lennon ("winston legthy"), mitch mitchell (drummer of the jimi hendrix experience), keith richards (on bass) and eric clapton. (nice performance, by the way). clapton was with cream around that time.
now, the clapton in that performance looks to me to be the same guy calling himself eric clapton today. please have a look for yourself if you think he isn't.
|
|
|
Post by PaulBearer on Mar 18, 2005 23:51:44 GMT
BeldaBeast wrote:
|
|
|
Post by PaulBearer on Mar 18, 2005 23:53:54 GMT
|
|
|
Post by byrdsmaniac on Mar 20, 2005 20:17:53 GMT
Perhaps worth a mention here:
"Royally Clueless" (from Rolling Stone, p.23, issue 970; the current issue) Queen Elizabeth has been sleeping on Britain's greatest export: rock and roll! When she met Eric Clapton, Jimmy Page, Jeff Beck, and Brian May at a U.K. music-industry reception, she had no idea who they were. "She asked Eric if he'd been playing long," says Phil Collins, also on hand. "He said, 'About 45 years ma'am.'" Seriously, would someone get her royal highness a copy of Zeppelin IV and a fat spliff. Fast!
(kind of shocking, really)
|
|
|
Post by TotalInformation on Mar 20, 2005 20:35:50 GMT
Her Majesty's a pretty nice girl, but she changes from day to day.
|
|
|
Post by PaulBearer on Mar 25, 2005 5:29:58 GMT
This is a specualtive thread only based on what originally looked like a spoof 60IF forum so I wouldn't put much credence in the idea of Clapton being replaced.
|
|