TheDZ
Provocative Operator 
Posts: 435
|
Post by TheDZ on Oct 23, 2005 19:02:34 GMT
It's huuuuge...  but Eric's replacement has smaller irises..and a longer chin. |
|
Pat
Contributor
Posts: 69
|
Post by Pat on Oct 23, 2005 20:52:43 GMT
uh maybe he was on acid or mushrooms in that photo, which would explain the bigger pupils... it was the 60s right?
|
|
bxv
Contributor
Posts: 77
|
Post by bxv on Oct 23, 2005 21:15:43 GMT
Pat, you are on acid mate. Look at their noses!! The 'Eric Clapton' in the Yardbirds photo is 'Eric Clapton', all the others are not. Larry, Curly and Mo...IMO.  |
|
|
|
Post by BeatlePaul on Oct 23, 2005 22:31:14 GMT
uh maybe he was on acid or mushrooms in that photo, which would explain the bigger pupils... it was the 60s right? Not about pupil dimension. Iris dimension and PATTERN don't change with age. That would be good as FINAL report about Doris and Foris too. (I have already checked that they are different....  ) |
|
TheDZ
Provocative Operator
Posts: 435
|
Post by TheDZ on Oct 24, 2005 4:08:53 GMT
....about the ears and a shift in head angle dropping them. Yes but...  ...not so much.  |
|
|
|
Post by BeatlePaul on Oct 24, 2005 10:44:17 GMT
Beatles - Dig It Lyrics Like a rolling stone A like a rolling stone Like the FBI and the CIA And the BBC-- BB KingAnd Doris Day Matt Busby Dig it, dig it, dig it Dig it, dig it, dig it, dig it, dig it, dig it, dig it, dig it [That was 'Can You Dig It' by Georgie Wood. And now we'd like to do 'Hark The Angels Come'.] Sometimes I think the right name of this forum would be Dig It!
|
|
|
|
Post by BeatlePaul on Oct 24, 2005 10:58:49 GMT
|
|
TheDZ
Provocative Operator
Posts: 435
|
Post by TheDZ on Oct 24, 2005 21:20:54 GMT
That's the real deal   Here's two Ferics.. note that while the angle is different, the ears move only a bit.   |
|
bxv
Contributor
Posts: 77
|
Post by bxv on Oct 24, 2005 22:36:58 GMT
 Dont think so! But what do I know, I'm an idiot right? Linkf**king muppets! |
|
|
|
Post by sinbad on Oct 24, 2005 23:46:59 GMT
Dont think so! But what do I know, I'm an idiot right? Link****ing muppets! What are you talking about? |
|
TheDZ
Provocative Operator
Posts: 435
|
Post by TheDZ on Oct 24, 2005 23:57:30 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by plastic paul on Oct 25, 2005 0:03:15 GMT
Yep DZ, spot on
|
|
bxv
Contributor
Posts: 77
|
Post by bxv on Oct 25, 2005 0:03:23 GMT
Sorry DZ, i disagree that your last pic is the same person. I cant see the high hairlined young Eric sprouting that mop. Their noses are different too. I'm not sure about the two Yardbirds Eric photos either. You think they are same?  Oh, and thats what I meant here! |
|
|
|
Post by plastic paul on Oct 25, 2005 0:17:11 GMT
I won't discount your opinion bxv, but you really need to get some better fades going...
PS. I'm not being bitchy, because thats still a million times better than anything i could do!
|
|
bxv
Contributor
Posts: 77
|
Post by bxv on Oct 25, 2005 0:20:10 GMT
Ok, yes good advice there. I went and read the Gimp manual. Second attempt here. Sorry the hairy dude got compressed.  It's getting better. Thanks for that bitchiness ;D there, I learned something tonight.  |
|
TheDZ
Provocative Operator
Posts: 435
|
Post by TheDZ on Oct 25, 2005 5:27:20 GMT
|
|
bxv
Contributor
Posts: 77
|
Post by bxv on Oct 25, 2005 7:18:26 GMT
No way HOSE! Different persons IMO. I can understand his nose being different, although the tales of legendary substance abuse could be a cover story. Ears and chin differ dramatically. Do we have some Faul type cheek padding going on?
|
|
|
|
Post by BeatlePaul on Oct 26, 2005 20:04:32 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by plastic paul on Oct 26, 2005 23:28:27 GMT
LOL, glad i could help bxv, though still not convinced!
.....Meow......
|
|
|
|
Post by defhermit on Oct 27, 2005 0:40:30 GMT
all those pictures look like the same guy to me.... don't have anything more to add...
|
|
|
|
Post by Perplexed on Oct 27, 2005 0:50:50 GMT
Well, as with Doris, I have tried, but, for myself, I am just not able to see any significant differences. Besides age, and smiling or not smiling, it seems like the same man in these two photos.
|
|
|
|
Post by sinbad on Oct 27, 2005 0:56:25 GMT
all those pictures look like the same guy to me.... don't have anything more to add... Wow! What a completely differently opinion than my own. I think Clapton's replacement is more obvious than Paul McCartney/Bill Sheppard. Way more. |
|
TheDZ
Provocative Operator
Posts: 435
|
Post by TheDZ on Oct 27, 2005 5:28:11 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by BeatlePaul on Oct 27, 2005 8:30:57 GMT
LOL, glad i could help bxv, though still not convinced! .....Meow...... all those pictures look like the same guy to me.... don't have anything more to add... Well, as with Doris, I have tried, but, for myself, I am just not able to see any significant differences. Besides age, and smiling or not smiling, it seems like the same man in these two photos. all those pictures look like the same guy to me.... don't have anything more to add... Wow! What a completely differently opinion than my own. I think Clapton's replacement is more obvious than Paul McCartney/Bill Sheppard. Way more. I confess.... that was a little "contest". I put no comment to see people reaction. There is NO feature that match between the twos. Sinbad won the contest "Full Debrainwashed Person". Sorry for the others. A little comment on what said by Sinbad: yes that one is "more obvious" because there is no make-up. |
|
|
|
Post by defhermit on Oct 27, 2005 16:28:11 GMT
Gee, I wish I agreed with everything BP says, so I too could get little pats on the back like this one...
|
|
)
